This saved copy is the September 15, 2025 Usage Policy, replaced by a newer version
The page says this document has been replaced by a newer version linked on the same page and is kept for archival purposes. The copy states it took effect on September 15, 2025, so the supplied text is that dated version rather than the version now published. Neither the replacement text nor its effective date is contained in this source, so no rule now in force can be stated from it.
Supporting quotations
This document has been replaced by a newer version, and is available for archival purposes
Effective September 15, 2025
Qualifications & exceptions
The replacement notice and the effective date sit above the policy text; the newer version is reachable only through a link.
Not stated here
The replacement version's text and effective date are not supplied here, so this source cannot state the rules currently in force.
The policy does not say whether this archived version still binds any user.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Context
The policy has three standards: universal, high-risk use cases, and additional guidelines
The policy is organised by who can use the products and for what purposes. Universal Usage Standards apply to all users and use cases. High-Risk Use Case Requirements apply to specific consumer-facing use cases that pose an elevated risk of harm. Additional Use Case Guidelines apply to certain other use cases, named there as consumer-facing chatbots, products serving minors, agentic use, and Model Context Protocol servers. Anthropic also says it will update the policy as its technology and the associated risks evolve.
Supporting quotations
The Usage Policy is categorized according to who can use our products and for what purposes.
Universal Usage Standards: Our Universal Usage Standards apply to all users and use cases.
High-Risk Use Case Requirements: Our High-Risk Use Case Requirements apply to specific consumer-facing use cases that pose an elevated risk of harm.
Additional Use Case Guidelines: Our Additional Use Case Guidelines apply to certain other use cases, including consumer-facing chatbots, products serving minors, agentic use, and Model Context Protocol servers.
We will update our policy as our technology and the associated risks evolve or as we learn about unanticipated risks.
Qualifications & exceptions
Each category's detailed rules appear in later sections of the same document; this card states how the document is organised.
The high-risk category is limited to specific consumer-facing use cases that pose an elevated risk of harm.
Not stated here
How a use case is judged to pose an elevated risk of harm is not stated in this introduction.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Anthropic may tailor use restrictions for certain government customers by contract
Anthropic says the policy balances enabling beneficial uses against mitigating potential harms, and that it may enter into contracts with certain governmental customers that tailor use restrictions to that customer's public mission and legal authorities. The tailoring is conditional on Anthropic's judgment that the contractual use restrictions and applicable safeguards adequately mitigate the potential harms addressed by the policy. This is a discretionary route for named government customers, not a general exception available to other users.
Supporting quotations
Anthropic may enter into contracts with certain governmental customers that tailor use restrictions to that customer’s public mission and legal authorities if, in Anthropic’s judgment, the contractual use restrictions and applicable safeguards are adequate to mitigate the potential harms addressed by this Usage Policy.
Qualifications & exceptions
Conditioned on Anthropic's own judgment that the tailored restrictions and safeguards are adequate to mitigate the potential harms addressed by the Usage Policy.
Limited to certain governmental customers and their public mission and legal authorities.
Not stated here
The tailored government contract terms are not supplied and may differ from the rules in this policy.
Cross-references
qualifies (model-proposed): The policy has three standards: universal, high-risk use cases, and additional guidelines — qualifies: The policy says its Universal Usage Standards apply to all users and use cases and separately that Anthropic may contract with certain governmental customers to tailor use restrictions to that customer’s public mission and legal authorities. The tailoring route adjusts those general standards for named government customers, on Anthropic’s judgment that the tailored restrictions and safeguards adequately mitigate the potential harms.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not use the services to break the law, trade in drugs or facilitate trafficking
Under the Universal Usage Standards, users may not violate applicable laws or engage in illegal activity. The examples given for using the products or services this way are acquiring or exchanging illegal or controlled substances, engaging in or facilitating human trafficking or prostitution, and violating any other applicable laws or regulations in the user's jurisdiction. The examples are introduced by “This includes”, so they illustrate the prohibition rather than exhaust it, and the catch-all points to the law of the user's own jurisdiction.
Supporting quotations
Universal Usage Standards
Do Not Violate Applicable Laws or Engage in Illegal Activity
This includes using our products or services to:
Acquire or exchange illegal or controlled substances
Engage in or facilitate human trafficking or prostitution
Violate any other applicable laws or regulations in your jurisdiction
Qualifications & exceptions
The listed conduct follows “This includes using our products or services to:”, so the list is illustrative.
The catch-all limb refers to applicable laws or regulations in the user's jurisdiction.
Not stated here
The policy does not state which jurisdiction's law governs a user who accesses the services from more than one place.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not incite violence, terrorism or hateful behavior, or discriminate by protected trait
Within the universal prohibitions, users may not incite, facilitate, or promote violent extremism, terrorism, or hateful behavior; provide material support for organizations or individuals associated with violent extremism, terrorism, or hateful behavior; facilitate or promote any act of violence or intimidation targeting individuals, groups, animals, or property; or promote discriminatory practices or behaviors against individuals or groups on the basis of one or more protected attributes such as race, ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or any other identifying trait. The protected attributes are examples introduced by “such as” and closed with “or any other identifying trait”, so the class is not limited to the named traits, and the violence limb reaches animals and property as well as people.
Supporting quotations
Do Not Incite Violence or Hateful Behavior
This includes using our products or services to:
Incite, facilitate, or promote violent extremism, terrorism, or hateful behavior
Provide material support for organizations or individuals associated with violent extremism, terrorism, or hateful behavior
Facilitate or promote any act of violence or intimidation targeting individuals, groups, animals, or property
Promote discriminatory practices or behaviors against individuals or groups on the basis of one or more protected attributes such as race, ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or any other identifying trait
Qualifications & exceptions
The protected-attribute list is illustrative (“such as”) and ends with “or any other identifying trait”.
The violence and intimidation limb covers individuals, groups, animals and property.
Material support is limited to organizations or individuals associated with violent extremism, terrorism or hateful behavior.
Not stated here
The policy does not define “hateful behavior” or “violent extremism”.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not present results as human-generated or convince people they talk to a human
Users may not impersonate a human by presenting results as human-generated, or use results in a manner intended to convince a natural person that they are communicating with a natural person when they are not. The rule has two limbs: presenting results as human-generated, and using results with that intent. It is framed around what the user does with results, not around naming a particular real person.
Supporting quotations
Impersonate a human by presenting results as human-generated, or using results in a manner intended to convince a natural person that they are communicating with a natural person when they are not
Qualifications & exceptions
Two limbs: presenting results as human-generated, and using results with the intent to convince a natural person they are communicating with a natural person.
Not stated here
The policy does not say what disclosure a product built on the services must give to avoid the second limb.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Company practice
A minor is anyone under 18 regardless of jurisdiction, and detected CSAM is reported
The policy defines a minor or child as any individual under the age of 18 years old, regardless of jurisdiction. Where Anthropic detects CSAM (including AI-generated CSAM), or coercion or enticement of a minor to engage in sexual activities, it will report to relevant authorities. The age definition applies whatever the local age of majority, and the reporting commitment is stated to follow detection of that conduct.
Supporting quotations
Note: We define a minor or child to be any individual under the age of 18 years old, regardless of jurisdiction.
When we detect CSAM (including AI-generated CSAM), or coercion or enticement of a minor to engage in sexual activities, we will report to relevant authorities.
Qualifications & exceptions
The under-18 definition applies regardless of jurisdiction.
Reporting follows detection of CSAM or of coercion or enticement of a minor to engage in sexual activities.
Not stated here
The policy does not name the authorities, a reporting timeline, or what happens to the account.
Cross-references
related (model-proposed): Users may not create CSAM or exploit, groom or sexualize minors, including via roleplay — defines: The children’s safety section defines a minor or child as anyone under 18 regardless of jurisdiction and describes reporting on detection of CSAM or coercion or enticement of a minor. That definition fixes the age scope of the CSAM, grooming and sexualization prohibitions in the same section.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not create deceptive information, fake personas or false health and science claims
Users may not create or disseminate deceptive or misleading information about, or with the intention of targeting, a group, entity or person; deceptive or misleading information about laws, regulations, procedures, practices, or standards established by an institution, entity or governing body; conspiratorial narratives meant to target a specific group, individual or entity; impersonation of real entities, or fake personas, to falsely attribute content or mislead others about its origin without consent or legal right; or false or misleading information related to medical, health or science issues. The first limb reaches information about a group, entity or person or created with the intention of targeting one, and the entity-impersonation limb is qualified by “without consent or legal right”.
Supporting quotations
Do Not Create or Spread Misinformation
This includes using our products or services to:
Create or disseminate deceptive or misleading information about, or with the intention of targeting, a group, entity or person
Create or disseminate deceptive or misleading information about laws, regulations, procedures, practices, standards established by an institution, entity or governing body
Create or disseminate conspiratorial narratives meant to target a specific group, individual or entity
Impersonate real entities or create fake personas to falsely attribute content or mislead others about its origin without consent or legal right
Provide false or misleading information related to medical, health or science issues
Qualifications & exceptions
The first limb covers information about a group, entity or person, or information created with the intention of targeting one.
Impersonating real entities or creating fake personas is prohibited without consent or legal right.
The medical, health or science limb is stated without a targeting requirement.
Not stated here
The policy does not define how falsity is assessed or who assesses it.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not target voters, run deceptive political movements or disrupt elections
Users may not undermine democratic processes or engage in targeted campaign activities. The listed examples are personalized vote or campaign targeting based on individual profiles or data; artificial or deceptive political movements in which the source, scale or nature of the campaign or activities is misrepresented; automated communications to public officials or voters at scale that conceal their artificial origin, or systematic vote solicitation that could undermine election integrity; political content designed to deceive or mislead voters, including synthetic media of political figures; false or misleading information in political and electoral contexts, including about candidates, parties, policies, voting procedures or election security; political lobbying or grassroots advocacy using false or fabricated information, or lobbying or advocacy materials containing demonstrably false claims about facts, data or events; inciting, glorifying or facilitating disruption of electoral or civic processes, including interference with voting systems, vote counting or certification; and content designed to suppress voter turnout or discourage legitimate political participation through deception or intimidation.
Supporting quotations
Do Not Undermine Democratic Processes or Engage in Targeted Campaign Activities
This includes using our products or services to:
Engage in personalized vote or campaign targeting based on individual profiles or data
Create artificial or deceptive political movements in which the source, scale or nature of the campaign or activities is misrepresented
Generate automated communications to public officials or voters at scale that conceal their artificial origin, or engage in systematic vote solicitation that could undermine election integrity
Create political content designed to deceive or mislead voters, including synthetic media of political figures
Generate or disseminate false or misleading information in political and electoral contexts, including about candidates, parties, policies, voting procedures, or election security
Engage in political lobbying or grassroots advocacy using false or fabricated information, or create lobbying or advocacy materials containing demonstrably false claims about facts, data, or events
Incite, glorify or facilitate the disruption of electoral or civic processes, including interference with voting systems, vote counting, or certification processes
Create content designed to suppress voter turnout or discourage legitimate political participation through deception or intimidation
Qualifications & exceptions
The automated-communications limb is limited to messages that conceal their artificial origin, or to systematic vote solicitation that could undermine election integrity.
The lobbying limb reaches advocacy using false or fabricated information and materials containing demonstrably false claims about facts, data or events.
Several limbs turn on deception or intimidation rather than on political content as such.
Not stated here
The policy does not define “election integrity” or say who assesses whether conduct could undermine it.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not make criminal justice determinations or use models to impair legal rights
Users may not make determinations on criminal justice applications, including making decisions about or determining eligibility for parole or sentencing. The same section prohibits utilizing models as part of any law enforcement application that violates or impairs the liberty, civil liberties, or human rights of natural persons. The first limb names parole and sentencing determinations as examples of criminal justice applications; the second is framed by the effect of the application on liberty, civil liberties or human rights.
Supporting quotations
Do Not Use for Criminal Justice, Censorship, Surveillance, or Prohibited Law Enforcement Purposes
This includes using our products or services to:
Make determinations on criminal justice applications, including making decisions about or determining eligibility for parole or sentencing
Utilize models as part of any law enforcement application that violates or impairs the liberty, civil liberties, or human rights of natural persons
Qualifications & exceptions
Parole and sentencing are given as examples of criminal justice determinations (“including”).
The law-enforcement limb is limited to applications that violate or impair liberty, civil liberties or human rights.
Not stated here
The policy does not define “criminal justice applications” beyond the parole and sentencing examples.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not track location, emotion or communication without consent, or do facial recognition
Users may not target or track a person’s physical location, emotional state, or communication without their consent, including using the products for facial recognition, battlefield management applications or predictive policing. The prohibition is qualified by the absence of the person’s consent, and facial recognition, battlefield management and predictive policing are given as examples of the prohibited uses.
Supporting quotations
Target or track a person’s physical location, emotional state, or communication without their consent, including using our products for facial recognition, battlefield management applications or predictive policing
Qualifications & exceptions
The tracking prohibition applies without the person’s consent.
Facial recognition, battlefield management applications and predictive policing are examples (“including”), not a closed list.
Not stated here
The policy does not say how consent must be obtained or evidenced.
Cross-references
contrast (model-proposed): Users may not build emotion recognition systems except for medical or safety reasons — contrast: One prohibition bars targeting or tracking a person’s emotional state without their consent; another bars building or supporting emotion recognition systems used to infer emotions, except for medical or safety reasons. Consent removes the first prohibition but is not a stated route around the second, so a consented emotion-inference system still needs a medical or safety purpose. The two provisions therefore condition emotion inference on different tests.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not analyze or identify content to censor for a government organization
Users may not analyze or identify specific content to censor on behalf of a government organization. The prohibition turns on the purpose of the analysis and the identity of the beneficiary, not on the content analyzed.
Supporting quotations
Analyze or identify specific content to censor on behalf of a government organization
Not stated here
The policy does not define “government organization” or address work for private intermediaries.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not facilitate production or distribution of counterfeit or illicitly acquired goods
Users may not facilitate the production, acquisition, or distribution of counterfeit or illicitly acquired goods. The prohibition covers production, acquisition and distribution, and applies to goods that are counterfeit or were acquired illicitly.
Supporting quotations
Do Not Engage in Fraudulent, Abusive, or Predatory Practices
This includes using our products or services to:
Facilitate the production, acquisition, or distribution of counterfeit or illicitly acquired goods
Not stated here
The policy does not define “illicitly acquired goods” or list covered product categories.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not promote or facilitate the generation or distribution of spam
Users may not promote or facilitate the generation or distribution of spam. The prohibition reaches both generating and distributing spam, and promoting or facilitating those activities by others.
Supporting quotations
Promote or facilitate the generation or distribution of spam
Not stated here
The policy does not define spam or set volume thresholds.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not create falsified documents such as fake IDs, licences or currency
Users may not create falsified documents, including fake IDs, licenses, currency, or other government documents. The listed items are examples introduced by “including”, and currency and other government documents fall within the same prohibition as identity and licence documents.
Supporting quotations
Create falsified documents including fake IDs, licenses, currency, or other government documents
Qualifications & exceptions
Fake IDs, licenses, currency and other government documents are examples, not a closed list.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not deploy subliminal or manipulative techniques that impair decision-making
Users may not develop a product, or support an existing service, that deploys subliminal, manipulative, or deceptive techniques to distort behavior by impairing decision-making. The prohibition applies to building or supporting such a product or service, and the technique must be used to distort behavior by impairing decision-making.
Supporting quotations
Develop a product or support an existing service that deploys subliminal, manipulative, or deceptive techniques to distort behavior by impairing decision-making
Qualifications & exceptions
The prohibited effect is distorting behavior by impairing decision-making.
Both developing a product and supporting an existing service are covered.
Not stated here
The policy does not define “subliminal” or “manipulative” techniques.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Users may not circumvent the guardrails or terms of other platforms and services
Users may not engage in actions or behaviors that circumvent the guardrails or terms of other platforms or services. The prohibition concerns conduct directed at third-party platforms and services, not at Anthropic’s own guardrails, which are addressed separately in the platform-abuse section.
Supporting quotations
Engage in actions or behaviors that circumvent the guardrails or terms of other platforms or services
Not stated here
The policy does not name which third-party terms or guardrails it refers to.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
High-risk use cases must implement human review and AI disclosure measures
Anthropic requires users and organizations to implement two additional safety measures for the High-Risk Use Cases described in the section: human-in-the-loop review by a qualified professional and disclosure that AI is being used. The stated rationale is that some use cases pose an elevated risk of harm because they influence domains vital to public welfare and social equity, so relevant human expertise should be integrated and end-users should be aware when AI has been involved in producing outputs. The measures are stated as requirements for those uses, not as guidance.
Supporting quotations
High-Risk Use Case Requirements
Some use cases pose an elevated risk of harm because they influence domains that are vital to public welfare and social equity.
for the “High-Risk Use Cases” described below, we require that you implement these additional safety measures
Qualifications & exceptions
The requirements attach only to the uses the policy itself labels High-Risk Use Cases.
Two measures are required: human-in-the-loop review and disclosure.
The rationale paragraph describes influence on domains vital to public welfare and social equity; the introductory summary of the policy describes the requirements as applying to specific consumer-facing use cases.
Not stated here
The policy does not say how a user should determine that its use falls in a listed category, or what happens to uses that span a listed and an unlisted domain.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
A qualified professional must review high-risk advice before it reaches people
When the products or services are used to provide advice, recommendations, or in subjective decision-making that directly affects individuals or consumers, a qualified professional in that field must review the content or decision before it is disseminated or finalized. The user or organization remains responsible for the accuracy and appropriateness of that information. The trigger is the type of use and its direct effect on individuals or consumers, so the duty is narrower than every use that appears on the High-Risk Use Cases list.
Supporting quotations
When using our products or services to provide advice, recommendations, or in subjective decision-making directly affecting individuals or consumers, a qualified professional in that field must review the content or decision prior to dissemination or finalization.
You or your organization are responsible for the accuracy and appropriateness of that information.
Qualifications & exceptions
The trigger is providing advice, recommendations, or subjective decision-making that directly affects individuals or consumers.
Review must occur before dissemination or finalization.
The reviewer must be a qualified professional in that field.
The user or organization remains responsible for the accuracy and appropriateness of the information.
Not stated here
The policy does not define “qualified professional” or describe required credentials.
The policy does not say whether review is needed for each output or may cover a process.
Cross-references
qualifies (model-proposed): High-risk use cases must implement human review and AI disclosure measures — qualifies: The requirements section states that two additional safety measures apply to the High-Risk Use Cases. The human-in-the-loop measure then specifies its trigger, the required reviewer and the timing of review, so the duty is narrower than every use that appears on the High-Risk Use Cases list.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Consumers must be told AI helped produce high-risk advice or decisions
If model outputs are presented directly to individuals or consumers, the user must disclose that AI is being used to help produce the advice, decisions, or recommendations. The disclosure must be given at a minimum at the beginning of each session. The duty is triggered by direct presentation of outputs to individuals or consumers, and the stated minimum is a timing floor rather than a limit on how often disclosure may be given.
Supporting quotations
If model outputs are presented directly to individuals or consumers, you must disclose to them that you are using AI to help produce your advice, decisions, or recommendations.
This disclosure must be provided at a minimum at the beginning of each session.
Qualifications & exceptions
The trigger is model outputs presented directly to individuals or consumers.
Disclosure must be given at a minimum at the beginning of each session.
Not stated here
The policy does not prescribe the wording or form of the disclosure.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
High-risk categories cover legal, insurance, finance, employment, education and media uses
The policy lists the High-Risk Use Cases that trigger the additional measures. Besides healthcare, which is carded separately, they are: legal interpretation, legal guidance, or decisions with legal implications; health, life, property, disability or other insurance underwriting, claims processing or coverage decisions; financial decisions including investment advice, loan approvals and determining financial eligibility or creditworthiness; employment and housing decisions, including employability, resume screening, hiring tools, employment determinations and eligibility for housing including leases and home loans; academic testing, accreditation and admissions, including standardized testing companies that administer school admissions and agencies that evaluate and certify educational institutions; and media or professional journalistic content generated automatically and published for external consumption.
Supporting quotations
“High-Risk Use Cases” include:
Legal: Use cases related to legal interpretation, legal guidance, or decisions with legal implications
Insurance: Use cases related to health, life, property, disability, or other types of insurance underwriting, claims processing, or coverage decisions
Finance: Use cases related to financial decisions, including investment advice, loan approvals, and determining financial eligibility or creditworthiness
Employment and housing: Use cases related to decisions about the employability of individuals, resume screening, hiring tools, or other employment determinations or decisions regarding eligibility for housing, including leases and home loans
Academic testing, accreditation and admissions: Use cases related to standardized testing companies that administer school admissions
Media or professional journalistic content: Use cases related to using our products or services to automatically generate content and publish it for external consumption
Qualifications & exceptions
The list is introduced as the uses that count as High-Risk Use Cases, so it defines where the human-in-the-loop and disclosure measures attach.
The media category covers automatic generation of content published for external consumption.
Employment and housing are grouped in one item.
Not stated here
The policy does not say whether a use that only partly matches a category is covered.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Healthcare is a high-risk category, but general wellness advice is excluded
Healthcare use cases related to healthcare decisions, medical diagnosis, patient care, therapy, mental health, or other medical guidance count as High-Risk Use Cases. Wellness advice, such as advice on sleep, stress, nutrition or exercise, does not fall under this category. The carve-out is stated by example, so it removes general wellness advice from the healthcare category without saying that such advice escapes every other part of the policy.
Supporting quotations
Healthcare: Use cases related to healthcare decisions, medical diagnosis, patient care, therapy, mental health, or other medical guidance.
Wellness advice (e.g., advice on sleep, stress, nutrition, exercise, etc.) does not fall under this category
Qualifications & exceptions
The item covers healthcare decisions, medical diagnosis, patient care, therapy, mental health and other medical guidance.
Wellness advice on sleep, stress, nutrition and exercise is expressly outside the healthcare category.
The carve-out removes the use from this category only; it does not state that other policy obligations are inapplicable.
Not stated here
The policy does not draw the line between medical guidance and wellness advice where they overlap, such as stress or sleep advice framed therapeutically.
Cross-references
narrows (model-proposed): High-risk categories cover legal, insurance, finance, employment, education and media uses — narrows: The healthcare item is listed among the High-Risk Use Cases, and the sentence that follows it puts general wellness advice outside that category. Read together, the category covers healthcare decisions and medical guidance but not wellness advice such as sleep, stress, nutrition or exercise.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Additional use case guidelines apply even when a use is not high-risk
A second set of requirements applies to the uses listed in the Additional Use Case Guidelines section: consumer-facing chatbots, products serving minors, agentic use, and Model Context Protocol servers. Those uses must comply with the guidance regardless of whether they are also High-Risk Use Cases, so the two layers of requirements can apply to the same use at the same time.
Supporting quotations
Additional Use Case Guidelines
regardless of whether they are High-Risk Use Cases
Qualifications & exceptions
The guidance applies regardless of whether the use is also a High-Risk Use Case.
The listed uses are consumer-facing chatbots, products serving minors, agentic use and MCP servers.
Not stated here
The policy does not say how the guidelines interact where a use falls into more than one listed category.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
All consumer-facing chatbots must say users are talking to AI, not a human
All consumer-facing chatbots, including any external-facing or interactive AI agent, must disclose to users that they are interacting with AI rather than a human. The disclosure must be provided at a minimum at the beginning of each chat session. The duty is stated for every consumer-facing chatbot, without a risk threshold.
Supporting quotations
All consumer-facing chatbots, including any external-facing or interactive AI agent, must disclose to users that they are interacting with AI rather than a human.
This disclosure must be provided at a minimum at the beginning of each chat session.
Qualifications & exceptions
The duty covers any external-facing or interactive AI agent, not only products described as chatbots.
The stated minimum timing is the beginning of each chat session.
Not stated here
The policy does not prescribe wording, and does not say whether a persistent banner satisfies the per-session minimum.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Products serving minors must follow Anthropic’s additional minors guidelines
Products serving minors, including organizations that let minors interact directly with products incorporating Anthropic’s APIs, must comply with the additional guidelines in the linked Help Center article on responsible use for organizations serving minors. The policy states the obligation and points to the article for its content.
Supporting quotations
Products serving minors, including organizations providing minors with the ability to directly interact with products that incorporate our API(s), must comply with the additional guidelines outlined in our Help Center article.
Qualifications & exceptions
The item covers direct interaction by minors with API-based products, as well as products serving minors generally.
The substantive guidelines are in the linked Help Center article, not in this document.
Not stated here
The linked Help Center article was not supplied in this source, so its guidelines are unknown here.
The policy does not define “products serving minors” by reference to an age or share of users.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Agentic use cases remain subject to the Usage Policy
Agentic use cases must still comply with the Usage Policy. The section points to a linked Help Center article for examples of how the Usage Policy prohibitions apply in agentic use, so agentic operation does not create an exemption from the prohibitions elsewhere in the policy.
Supporting quotations
Agentic use cases must still comply with the Usage Policy.
Qualifications & exceptions
The requirement is stated as continuing compliance with the Usage Policy, not as a separate rule set.
Worked examples of the prohibitions in agentic contexts are in the linked article.
Not stated here
The linked Help Center article was not supplied in this source, so its agentic examples are unknown here.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
MCP servers in the Connector Directory must follow the Directory Policy
Model Context Protocol servers listed in Anthropic’s Connector Directory must comply with the linked Directory Policy. The requirement attaches to servers that are listed in the directory and points to that policy for its content.
Supporting quotations
Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers listed in our Connector Directory must comply with our Directory Policy.
Qualifications & exceptions
The requirement attaches to MCP servers listed in the Connector Directory.
The substantive rules are in the linked Directory Policy, not in this document.
Not stated here
The linked Directory Policy was not supplied in this source, so its content is unknown here.