Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Context
Policy released March 27, 2025 and effective April 26, 2025
This version of the Intellectual Property Policy states that it was released on March 27, 2025 and took effect on April 26, 2025. The release date and the effective date are different: the rules described in this version apply from April 26, 2025.
Supporting quotations
Released March 27, 2025
Effective April 26, 2025
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Consider permitted acts; intentionally misleading trademark reports are denied and may create liability
Before reporting, a trademark owner should consider whether permitted acts under trademark laws apply. An intentionally misleading or fraudulent report will be denied and may lead to liability for damages under applicable laws.
Supporting quotations
Before submitting a report, you should consider the applicability of permitted acts under trademark laws.
Please also be aware that intentionally submitting a misleading or fraudulent report will result in your report being denied and may lead to liability for damages under applicable laws.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Context
Users are responsible for what they post and may want a lawyer for IP questions
The policy states that, as a TikTok user, you are responsible for the content you post. If you have questions about copyright or trademark law, such as whether your content or your use of someone else's name or brand infringes their rights, the policy suggests you may want to contact an attorney. TikTok does not offer to answer those legal questions itself.
Supporting quotations
As a TikTok user, you are responsible for the content you post.
If you have questions about copyright law or trademark law, such as questions about whether your content or your use of another person’s name or brand infringes or otherwise violates another person’s rights, you may want to contact an attorney.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Procedure
Rightsholders unsure about infringement may wish to get legal advice before reporting
A holder of intellectual property rights who is unsure whether content they plan to report infringes their rights may wish to seek legal advice first. This is a suggestion, not a requirement for filing a report.
Supporting quotations
As a holder of intellectual property rights, if you are unsure whether the content you plan to report to us is infringing your intellectual property rights, you may wish to first seek legal advice before reporting such content to us.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
TikTok does not adjudicate IP disputes and may not remove reported content
TikTok says it is not in a position to adjudicate disputes between third parties, and may not be able to remove reported content or suspend the reported account. This limits both the copyright and the trademark reporting processes: a report is a request, not a guaranteed removal.
Supporting quotations
TikTok is not in a position to adjudicate disputes between third parties, and may not be able to remove the content or suspend the account being reported.
You may also file a Copyright Infringement Report to request the removal of the alleged infringing content from TikTok via our [online form](https://www.tiktok.com/legal/report/Copyright) or in-app.
You may also file a Trademark Infringement Report to request the removal of the alleged infringing content from TikTok via our [online form](https://www.tiktok.com/legal/report/Trademark) or in-app.
Cross-references
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · User right or choice
TikTok provides an IP dispute mechanism; courts and out-of-court routes may also exist
In accordance with its legal obligations, TikTok says it provides users and rightholders with an intellectual property rights infringement dispute resolution mechanism (the report and appeal processes described in this policy). Users or rightholders may also have other ways to seek resolution, such as out-of-court dispute settlement or court proceedings under the laws of their countries.
Supporting quotations
In accordance with our legal obligations, we provide users and rightholders with an intellectual property rights infringement dispute resolution mechanism.
Users or rightholders may have other ways to seek resolution, such as out-of-court dispute settlement processes or in-court proceedings under laws in their countries.
Qualifications & exceptions
- Other routes depend on the laws in the user's or rightholder's country ("may have").
Not stated here
- The policy does not name the legal obligations it refers to or which out-of-court settlement bodies are available.
Legal Rights & Agreement Rules · Restriction or exception
Consider permitted uses; intentionally misleading reports are denied and may create liability
Before reporting, a rightsholder should consider whether the content may be a permissible use of their copyright. An intentionally misleading or fraudulent report will be denied and may lead to liability for damages under section 512(f) of the US DMCA or similar laws in other countries. The denial is stated as certain; liability is a possibility under the cited laws.
Supporting quotations
Before submitting a report, you should consider whether the content you want to report may be a permissible use of your copyright.
Please also be aware that intentionally submitting a misleading or fraudulent report will result in your report being denied and may lead to liability for damages under section 512(f) of the United States DMCA or similar laws in other countries.
Not stated here
- Section 512(f) of the DMCA is cited but its text is not supplied in this policy.