Sharing & Disclosure · Company practice
DraftKings does not disclose customer enforcement actions
DraftKings says it cannot comment on public assumptions or disclose corrective actions or enforcement taken against a customer, to protect contest integrity and customer privacy. This limits what it says publicly about individual enforcement; the article separately invites customers to submit integrity concerns.
Details not recorded for this card
Supporting quotations
To protect both the integrity of our contests and the privacy of our customers, DraftKings cannot comment on any public assumptions or disclose any corrective actions or enforcement taken against a customer.
Qualifications & exceptions
- DraftKings gives contest integrity and customer privacy as the reasons for this nondisclosure.
Cross-references
- contrast (model-proposed): DraftKings monitors peer-to-peer games and reviews customer concerns — DraftKings invites and commits to review customer integrity concerns, while saying it cannot comment on public assumptions or disclose customer enforcement actions. Reporting a concern does not imply public disclosure of the outcome.