Roku Limited Warranty (Roku brand televisions)

Roku · Official agreement

Read the agreement

1 of 23 cards in Charges & Financial Obligations

Charges & Financial Obligations · Restriction or exception

Roku excludes lost profits and incidental or consequential damages and caps recovery at the purchase price

Roku states it shall not be liable for loss of revenue or profits, failure to realize savings or other benefits, or any other special, incidental or consequential damages caused by the use, misuse or inability to use the device, whatever legal theory the claim rests on and even if Roku was advised of the possibility of those damages. It also states that recovery of any kind against Roku shall not exceed the purchase price of the device that caused the alleged damage.

Details
What it covers
Loss of revenue or profits, failure to realize savings or other benefits, special, incidental or consequential damages
Condition
Regardless of the legal theory and even if Roku was advised of the possibility of such damages
What it covers
Recovery capped at the purchase price of the Device

Supporting quotations

ROKU SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR LOSS OF REVENUE OR PROFITS, FAILURE TO REALIZE SAVINGS OR OTHER BENEFITS, OR ANY OTHER SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE USE, MISUSE, OR INABILITY TO USE THIS DEVICE, REGARDLESS OF THE LEGAL THEORY ON WHICH THE CLAIM IS BASED, AND EVEN IF ROKU HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
NOR SHALL RECOVERY OF ANY KIND AGAINST ROKU BE GREATER IN AMOUNT THAN THE PURCHASE PRICE OF THE DEVICE SOLD BY ROKU AND CAUSING THE ALLEGED DAMAGE.

Qualifications & exceptions

  • Excludes loss of revenue or profits, failure to realize savings or other benefits, and special, incidental or consequential damages caused by the use, misuse or inability to use this Device.
  • Applies regardless of the legal theory on which the claim is based, and even if Roku has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
  • Recovery of any kind against Roku is capped at the purchase price of the Device sold by Roku that caused the alleged damage.

Not stated here

  • The document does not state whether the cap includes the device's purchase price as paid to an Authorized Dealer rather than to Roku.

Cross-references

Also annotated in the same passage (3)