Accounts of repeat copyright infringers may be banned, and severe cases immediately
TikTok says it has adopted and reasonably implemented a repeat infringer policy under which, in appropriate circumstances, it bans the account of a user who repeatedly commits copyright infringement. It may use its discretion to ban an account immediately in cases of severe copyright violations.
Details
Who
TikTok
What it does
ban the account
Condition
user repeatedly commits copyright infringement, or severe copyright violation
Supporting quotations
under which we, in appropriate circumstances, ban the account of a user who repeatedly commits copyright infringement.
We may exercise our discretion to immediately ban any account in cases of severe copyright violations.
Qualifications & exceptions
Bans for repeat infringement apply "in appropriate circumstances", not automatically.
Immediate bans are tied to "severe" violations and TikTok's discretion.
Not stated here
The passage does not define "repeatedly", "appropriate circumstances" or "severe", and does not give a number of infringements.
TikTok reserves the right to refuse a new account to a holder whose account was used for improper activities
TikTok reserves the right to refuse an account holder whose account was used for improper activities from opening a new TikTok account. The sentence sits in the copyright removal and bans subsection, but its wording refers to "improper activities" rather than naming copyright infringement.
Details
Who
TikTok
What it does
refuse the account holder from opening a new account
Condition
account was used for improper activities
Supporting quotations
We reserve the right to refuse any account holder whose account was used for improper activities from opening a new TikTok account.
Qualifications & exceptions
It is a reserved right ("reserve the right to refuse"), not a statement that every such holder is refused.
Scope is account holders whose account "was used for improper activities".
Not stated here
"Improper activities" is not defined in this passage, so it is unclear whether it is limited to copyright infringement.
Accounts of repeat trademark infringers may be banned, and severe cases immediately
TikTok says it has adopted and reasonably implemented a repeat infringer policy under which, in appropriate circumstances, it bans the account of a user who repeatedly commits trademark infringement. It may use its discretion to ban an account immediately in cases of severe trademark violations.
Details
Who
TikTok
What it does
ban the account
Condition
user repeatedly commits trademark infringement, or severe trademark violation
Supporting quotations
under which we, in appropriate circumstances, ban the account of a user who repeatedly commits trademark infringement.
We may exercise our discretion to immediately ban any account in cases of severe trademark violations.
Qualifications & exceptions
Bans for repeat infringement apply "in appropriate circumstances", not automatically.
Immediate bans are tied to "severe" violations and TikTok's discretion.
Not stated here
The passage does not define "repeatedly", "appropriate circumstances" or "severe", and does not give a number of infringements.
TikTok reserves the right to refuse a new account to a holder whose account was used for improper activities
TikTok reserves the right to refuse an account holder whose account was used for improper activities from opening a new TikTok account. The sentence sits in the trademark removal and bans subsection, but its wording refers to "improper activities" rather than naming trademark infringement.
Details
Who
TikTok
What it does
refuse the account holder from opening a new account
Condition
account was used for improper activities
Supporting quotations
We reserve the right to refuse any account holder whose account was used for improper activities from opening a new TikTok account.
Qualifications & exceptions
It is a reserved right, not a statement that every such holder is refused.
Scope is account holders whose account "was used for improper activities".
Not stated here
"Improper activities" is not defined in this passage, so it is unclear whether it is limited to trademark infringement.